Thanks to Chris Spaseff for this news item.
Fellow Retired Ford, GM, Chrysler Friends -
This was sent to me by my close friend, Don Suszko, a GM retiree, who felt that this information would pertain to anyone retired from the Big Three.
Subject: Your Pension and the Potential of GM Filing for Bankruptcy
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 03, 2008
PBGC News Division
PBGC Announces Maximum Insurance Benefit for 2009
WASHINGTON-The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) today announced that the maximum insurance benefit for participants in underfunded pension plans terminating in 2009 is $54,000 per year for those who retire at age 65, up from $51,750 for 2008. The amount is higher for those who retire later and lower for those who retire earlier or elect survivor benefits (see chart). If a pension plan terminates in 2009 but a participant does not begin collecting benefits until a future year, the 2009 maximum insurance limits still apply. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 provides that the maximum benefit payable is determined by the legal limits in force on the date of the plan sponsor's bankruptcy and not on the date of plan termination.
The maximum insurance benefit is set by law. Two additional legal limits on PBGC's insurance coverage can also affect participants' benefits. The first prohibits the PBGC from guaranteeing benefits that exceed the amount payable at t he plan's normal retirement age. The second limits PBGC's guarantee of benefit increases made within the five years prior to plan termination, or the date the sponsor filed for bankruptcy, if the sponsor is in bankruptcy when the plan terminates. For more information, see PBGC's fact sheet "Pension Guarantees" (http://www.pbgc.gov/media/key-resources-for-the-press/content/page13542.html ).
The overwhelming majority of the participants in plans taken over by the agency face no reduction in benefits due to the legal limits on coverage, PBGC research shows. The largest reductions occur in cases where participants earn pensions that 1) significantly exceed the maximum insurance benefit, or 2) provide generous early retirement subsidies.
Under the PBGC's single-employer insurance program, retirees sometimes can receive more than the maximum guaranteed benefit. In general, three conditions must apply: 1) the participant earned a benefit in excess of the maximum guaranteed amount; 2) the participant retired or was eligible to retire at least three years prior to plan termination; and 3) the plan had sufficient assets to pay benefits above the guaranteed amount.
PBGC is a federal corporation created under ERISA. It currently guarantees payment of basic pension benefits earned by 44 million American workers and retirees participating in over 30,000 private-sector defined benefit pension plans. The agency receives no funds from general tax revenues. Operations are financed largely by insurance premiums paid by companies that sponsor pension plans and investment returns.
< FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>? ### ?
By Barry B. Burr; Pensions & Investments ~ Nov 07, 2008
General Motors Corp., Detroit, does not expect to have to make any pension contributions to meet minimum funding requirements in the next three to four years, even though its funded status declined in the first nine months of 2008 because of negative investment returns and recent employee-related cutbacks, according to its third-quarter financial report today.
The GM hourly plan was $500 million underfunded as of Sept. 30, the report said. The salaried plan was overfunded as of July 1, the latest date GM provided, which didn't specify by how much. Both plans were overfunded on a combined basis, the report said. It didn't disclose a recent total value of the plans.
As of Dec. 31, GM's U.S. pension plans had a combined $104 billion in assets and $85 billion in liabilities, according to its 10-K filing.
The company reported a $4.9 billion gain from terminating GM's retiree health-care plan for United Auto Workers members. That GM plan won't exist after Jan. 1, 2010, under an agreement moving UAW-represented employees into an independent voluntary employee benefit association fund.
That $4.9 billion gain was partially offset by a $1.7 billion loss that resulted from a combination of the following: GM's elimination of its U.S. salaried retiree health-care coverage effective in 2009, a cut valued at $2.8 billion, while raising U.S. salaried pension benefits, an increase valued at $2.6 billion, and also taking $1.9 billion in accelerated actuarial losses.
Julie Gibson, GM spokeswoman, couldn't be reached for comment.
By Nanet te Byrnes; Business Week ~ Oct 23, 2008
If you're retired, you're probably getting pretty worried by now. The stock market's gyrations (BusinessWeek.com, 10/23/08) are painful for all, but some of the most dramatic numbers are the losses being reported by pension funds.
According to benefit consulting firm Mercer, traditional pension plans sponsored by large U.S. companies have seen their funding fall by almost $100 billion this year. And if corporate bond yields, which are used by most companies to measure the value of their plan liabilities, were to return to more typical levels, that number could increase to more than $400 billion.
Those concerns will bring Charles Millard, director of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (PBGC), the government-sponsored insurer of pension plans, to Capitol Hill on Friday, Oct. 24. His testimony before the House of Representatives' Committee on Education & Labor will center in part around the $3 billion in stock market losses the PBGC itself has sustained since last October.
Underwater Pension Plans
A recent analysis by UBS Investment Research (UBS) estimates that 236 companies in the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index have pension plans that are underwater?their assets are less than their obligations?though many just barely so. On its critical list were 20 companies with pension plan assets equal to or greater than the market cap of the parent company, among them General Motors (GM) and Ford (F). The PBGC currently manages 3,800 plans.
Those are all big numbers. But it's unclear whether Congress will do much about them. The committee's main focus seems to be the PBGC's investment strategy, which the chair of the Education & Labor Committee, U.S. Representative George Miller (D-Calif.), has described as a controversial shift from fixed-income securities such as U.S. Treasuries to more risky securities like real estate.
Still, experts say retirees with traditional defined-benefit pensions have little to worry about. If you're reliant on a 401(k), there is reason to be concerned. Here are some answers to the questions all this raises for those near or in retirement:
If a company's pension plan sustains big losses, will that affect the checks being received by current retirees?
It should not, says Mark Johnson, former director of American Airlines' (AMR) pension plan, which had assets of $14 billion in 2001 when he took early retirement. He is now a consultant with Erisa Benefits Consulting of Grapevine, Tex. Companies may have to contribute more to the plans to meet their obligations, but participants' benefits won't be cut.
However, there's a good chance that more companies will be freezing these plans in the near future, Johnson argues, because of the drop in asset value. New accounting rules for pensions could well mean many companies have to put additional cash into their plans to shore them up quickly. That would accelerate a long-term trend away from these plans, where companies make the contributions, and toward 401(k)-type plans, where employees make pretax contributions and their employers may kick in some matching amount.
What if the bank or financial company that sends me my pension check each month is in trouble or bought? Could that affect my income?
No. They are only the processor of your payment. Your former employer is the one that funds your pension, and pension-plan assets are separate and distinct from all other assets of both your former employer and the third-party check processor.
Should I worry about the fact that the PBGC has lost $3 billion?
If you are one of the 1.3 million people whose employer has gone bankrupt and your plan has been taken over by the PBGC, you might find that $3 bil lion figure disconcerting. But "people shouldn't be worried," says Jeffrey Spiker, a spokesman for the agency. The PBGC has assets of $68 billion, plenty to pay current obligations. Although it has lost money on its equity portfolio, the agency has made money on bonds, where its investments traditionally have been focused.
From last October to the end of August, Spiker says, the PBGC is down about $1.2 billion, or 6%, "which is not bad for this environment." Also, interest rates have been dropping fast, which lowers the agency's calculation of liabilities. So fast, in fact, that the PBGC is likely to come out of this downturn with a $2 billion smaller deficit than it had last year.
What happens if things get so bad at my employer that it goes into bankruptcy and the PBGC takes over my plan?will my benefits drop?
For most people, benefits won't change after a transfer. But in some cases your check can shrink after a PBGC plan takeover. Benefit increases made within five years of the PB GC accepting the plan will not be honored. Also, you can be penalized if you decided to retire before 65. The maximum the PBGC will pay per person is set each year by Congress. For pension plans terminating in 2008, the maximum is $51,750 per year for those who retire at age 65, up from $49,500 for 2007.
What if my company is running a big pension deficit and I think they may freeze the plan? Is there anything I can do to maximize it ahead of time?
Unfortunately, no. "Defined benefit plans are not interactive. You can't increase your contribution," says Johnson. "You're along for the ride."
What do I do if I only have a 401(k)?
Retirees relying on 401(k)s are feeling the pain, without a doubt?especially if they were heavily invested in international stocks, or any stocks for that matter. But Johnson advises they don't panic. "Over time it will come back, the markets always come back," Johnson says. "If you sell stocks and buy all bonds, you're locking in those losses. You've turned them from paper losses to real losses."
Still, if you're actually relying on 401(k) distributions to pay the rent, you do have a real problem. Minimize that as much as you can, says Johnson, either by using other assets first, or maybe by taking on part-time work, if that's possible.
Byrnes is a senior writer for BusinessWeek in New York.